Find out whether phishing works on your team
We run realistic phishing scenarios on an agreed audience and show where the human factor opens access to the company.
Technical defences do not help when access is handed over voluntarily
No vulnerability in the code is needed here. An email that looks routine is enough.
The attack breaks nothing
An attacker does not need a vulnerability if an employee types their password into a lookalike page.
The email looks ordinary
A message from "accounting", a contractor or a manager raises no suspicion — especially at the end of the working day.
One click, and that is already access
What follows is not an attack but an ordinary login under a legitimate account. Nothing unusual in the logs.
How the simulation runs
Scenarios, scope and audience are agreed before launch. The only surprises are in the results.
Agreeing the scenario
We pick realistic scenarios for your company and agree the boundaries: what may be used and what may not.
Audience
We determine who takes part: departments, roles, number of people.
Simulation
We send the agreed scenarios. No real consequences for employees or working systems.
Measuring behaviour
We record the response: who opened, who clicked, who reported the suspicious email and how quickly.
Walkthrough
We show the results in aggregate: where exactly the risk appears and why it appears there.
Recommendations
What to change in processes, settings and training so that next time the result is different.
The goal is to measure behaviour, not to collect credentials
The simulation exists to show how the team responds and to fix the processes. We do not use the results to put pressure on individual people.
Reporting is aggregated: a manager sees the picture by department and role, not a list of "who fell for it".
What you will know after the simulation
How many people clicked through
And at exactly which stage they stopped: opened the email, followed the link, went further.
Risky behaviour
Which actions create risk: entering data, downloading files, replying to the email.
Weak spots in the structure
Which departments and roles respond worst — and why that is logical for them specifically.
Patterns
Which scenarios work best on your team: time pressure, authority, familiar routine.
Recommendations
Specific changes to processes and settings, not general advice to "be careful".
Material for training
Examples from your own simulation — a team learns from those far better than from someone else's.
What we do after the test
One simulation shows the state. The second one shows the change.
Walkthrough with management
We go through the results on a call: what happened, where the risk is, what to do about it first.
Training on your own examples
The materials are built on the scenarios that actually worked on your team.
Repeat simulation
After an agreed interval we repeat it, so you can see the trend instead of guessing at it.
Who needs it most
- Teams of 20 people and up
- Finance and accounting — wherever payments get approved
- SaaS products with access to client data
- E-commerce, where the admin panel means money and orders
- Distributed and remote teams
- Companies with a large number of accounts and external services
The founder leads every project and answers for the result
I lead the project and answer for the result. We build the scenarios for your company, not from a stock template.
I lead a cybersecurity team. Since 2019 I have run 170+ penetration tests for 80+ companies. I have worked on the security of many Ukrainian banks and payment systems, as well as government bodies and law enforcement. The founder runs the project, and nothing is handed to outside contractors.
I test systems the same way a real attacker does — from the outside, with no hints, with no access from within.
Frequently asked questions
Other Veiltrack security services
If the risk is not only in people
A simulation tests the human factor. The technical side is covered by other formats.
Vulnerability Assessment
When you need to check what is visible and reachable from the outside at a technical level.
Veiltrack Security Program
When the human factor is only one of several things that need testing.
Book a 30-minute review call
On a short call we will determine the size of the audience, the scenarios and the boundaries. After that — only with your approval.